67. Engebrecht, J. A beneficial., J. Hirsch, Grams. S. Roeder. Telephone -937 (1990). 68. Esposito, Roentgen. E., Yards. S. Esposito.Geneticrecombination and commitment to meiosis for the Saccharomyces. Proc. Nad Acad. Sci. Usa -3176 (1974). 69. Esposito, R. Age., Roentgen. Holliday. The outcome of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine on genetic replication and you can somatic recombination inside the synchronously dividing countries off Ustilago maydis. Genes -1017 (1964). 70. Futcher, B., J. Carbon dioxide. Poisonous results of continuously cloned centromeres. Mol. Phone Biol. 6
B. The relationship between synaptonemal buildings, recombination nodules and crossing-over in Neurosporacrassa bivalents and you will translocation quadrivalents
2213-2222(1986). 71. Gardiner, K., D. Patterson. Transverse alternating electrophoresis.Characteristics (Lond.) -372 (1988). 72. Gaudet, Good., Meters. Fitzgerald-Hayes.Mutations from inside the CEN3 end in aberrant chromosome segregation duringmeiosis into the Saccharomycescerevisiae.Genes -489 (1989). 73. Gillies, C. B. Repair of your own Neurospora crussa pachytene karyotype regarding serial areas of synaptonemal buildings. Chromosoma -130 (1972). 74. Gillies, C. B. Synaptonemalcomplex and you will chromosome structure.Annu. Rev. getiton.com nedir Genet. 9:91-109 (1975). 75. Gillies, C. Genetics 91:1 (1979). 76. Girbardt, Meters. Ultrastructure of the fungal nucleus. eleven. The brand new kinetochore similar (KCE). J. Cellphone Sci. 9453473 (1971). 77. Giroux, C. N., Meters. E. Closet, H. F. Tiano. Geneticcontrolof chromosome synapsis from inside the fungus meiosis.